Legal Opinion · Dissent

State Ex Rel. Livingston v. Ayer

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 1945No. 29691Published

1DissentSimpson, J.

(dissenting) — It is elementary that a statute must be sustained and enforced unless it is in clear and irreconcilable conflict with some express provision of the constitution. On the other hand, if the constitutional provision and the legislative enactment are so clearly in conflict that they cannot both stand, the statutory provision must of course fail.

In construing a statute, every reasonable intendment will be indulged in, in favor of the construction that is in con formity with the provision of the constitution. If a reasonable doubt appears, it should be resolved in favor of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Walker v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Sears v. Western Thrift Stores of Olympia, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Coleman, Auditor v. HurstCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  4. State ex rel. City of Seattle v. CarsonWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  5. State v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1914

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API