Legal Opinion

Kornblum v. Southern Pac. Co.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided September 10, 1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

INCH, District Judge.

Plaintiff commenced this common-law action against defendant in the state court. It was removed to this court. Plaintiff has served an alleged subpoena on defendant and has also served what is termed by plaintiff, from copy of tbe paper submitted, as a “notice for examination of defendant as an adverse party before trial.”

Defendant now moves for an order vacating said notice of examination before trial and setting aside tbe said subpoena issued pursuant thereto.

This cause having been duly removed to this court, it must have a free band to dispose of such motions.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte FISKSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Dicks-David Co. v. Edward Maurer Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1922
  3. Donnelly v. Anderson Brown & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1921
  4. John A. Roebling's Sons Co. of California v. KinnicuttDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1917

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bailey v. Texas Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1929
  2. Disalvo v. American Brass Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API