Legal Opinion
FEUSS v. ENICA ENGINEERING, PLLC
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 26, 2021No. 2:20-cv-02034Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY SANDIN FEUSS and CHRISTOPHER NADY, Plaintiffs, Civ. No. 20-02034 (KM) (JBC) v. OPINION ENICA ENGINEERING, PLLC, and REED BERINATO, Defendants. KEVIN MCNULTY, U.S.D.J.: Sandin Feuss and Christopher Nady developed a technology for building- controlled systems (i.e., heating, air conditioning, etc.). The two agreed to work with Reed Berinato and his company, Enica Engineering, PLLC (collectively “Berinato”), who would patent the technology and bring it to market. Berinato pursued the patent process, ultimately obtaining the patent, but…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Constitution Party of Pennsylv v. Carol AicheleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Gould Electronics Inc., F/k/a Gould Inc. American Premier Underwriters, Inc. v. United States of America Gould Electronics Inc. American Premier Underwriters, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- In Re Schering Plough Corp. Intron/Temodar Consumer Class ActionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.