Legal Opinion

Akemi Tanaka v. Caris MPI, Inc. (d/b/a Caris Life Sciences)

District Court, S.D. California

Decided September 28, 2026No. 3:25-cv-01376Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 AKEMI TANAKA, an individual, Case No.: 25-cv-1376-BJC-MSB 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION 12 v. 13 CARIS MPI, INC. (d/b/a Caris Life [ECF No. 18, 21] Sciences), a Texas corporation; and DOES 14 1 through 50, inclusive, 15 Defendants. 16 17 Before the Court is Defendant Caris MPI, Inc.’s (“Caris” or “Defendant”) Motion to 18 Compel Arbitration, ECF No. 18, and Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply. ECF 19 No. 21. The matters are submitted on the briefs without oral argument. See…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Arthur Andersen LLP v. CarlisleSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. American Express Co. v. Italian Colors RestaurantSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API