Legal Opinion

Hirt v. Mancuso

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 25, 2011Published

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action seeking damages for injuries he sustained when he was allegedly assaulted by defendants Michael Durso and Joseph Mazza at the direction of defendant Paul Mancuso. Supreme Court properly granted *1648defendants’ motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Defendants met their initial burden by establishing that the action, commenced more than one year after the alleged assault, is time-barred (see CPLR 215 [3]), and plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact whether the limitations period was extended by virtue of CPLR 215 (8) (a),…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Villanueva v. ComparettoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. Jordan v. BrittonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. Christodoulou v. TerdemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API