Legal Opinion

Smith v. Franke

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 22, 2014No. CV101060; A149418PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, P. J.

Following a jury trial, petitioner was convicted of first-degree sodomy, ORS 163.405, first-degree sexual abuse, ORS 163.427, and using a child in a display of sexual conduct, ORS 163.670.1 He subsequently filed a petition for post-conviction relief, alleging, among other things, that his trial attorney was constitutionally inadequate in failing to object when a police officer testified that the alleged victim knew the difference between the truth and a lie. The post-conviction court denied the petition, and petitioner appeals the resulting judgment, asserting that counsel was…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State v. MiddletonOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. MilbradtOregon Supreme Court · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wilson v. PremoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. State v. InmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. State v. KimCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  4. State v. RhoadesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API