Legal Opinion
Page v. Clark
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided June 15, 1917PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtFinelite, J.
At the. termination of the trial both sides moved for the direction of a verdict. The court entertained plaintiff’s motion and directed a verdict in the plaintiff’s favor in the sum of $1,594.47 and denied the motion of the defendants. The defendants thereupon moved for a new trial upon all the grounds *396specified in section 999 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which motion the cotirt entertained. It appears from the facts herein that the defendants are copartners doing business under the firm name of Clark, Childs & Co., having their principal office in the city of New York; that the plaintiff…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Knox v. Eden Musee Americain Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Boyce v. . BrockwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
- Graves v. . the American Exchange BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- The People v. . Bank of North AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Hoffman v. CarowCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1839
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pierpoint v. FarnumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
- Parker v. P & N Recovery of New York, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1999