Legal Opinion
Blasko v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 8, 2007No. Civil Action Nos. 07-0833 (RMU), 07-0544(RMU)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
URBINA, District Judge.
Granting Plaintiff Blasko’s Partial Consent Motion for Consolidation; Granting in Part and Denying in Part the Defendant’s Motion for Consolidation
I. INTRODUCTION
The plaintiffs, Gregory Schoenborn and Molly Blasko, bring separate wrongful death and survival actions against the defendant, Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority CWMATA”). Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a), the defendant moves for full consolidation of these actions, and plaintiff Blasko brings a partial consent motion for consolidation for discovery purposes only.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- A/s J. Ludwig Mowinckles Rederi v. Tidewater Construction Corporation, Lone Star Industries, Inc. v. Gearbulk, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
- Stewart v. O'NEILLDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Chang v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- New York v. Microsoft Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Monzo v. American Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
3Cited by8 opinions
- Singh v. CarterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Klayman v. Judicial Watch, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- American Civil Liberties Union Foundation v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
- Avila v. National Labor Relations BoardDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
- Brophy v. AdkinsDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.