Legal Opinion

Stein v. Pfizer Inc.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 31, 2016No. 1231/14PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKrauser, C.J.

The issue before us is whether Pfizer Inc., appellee, may be deemed an “apparent manufacturer” of an asbestos-containing cement, “Insulag,” which purportedly caused the illness and subsequent death of Carl Stein from mesothelioma. The product at issue was manufactured and sold to Mr. Stein’s employer, Bethlehem Steel Corporation, by Quigley, Inc., both before and after it became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pfizer.

If Pfizer does not qualify as an “apparent manufacturer,” then it is covered by the “channeling injunction” issued by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Suvada v. White Motor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Webb v. ZernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. West v. Caterpillar Tractor Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1976
  5. Codling v. PagliaNew York Court of Appeals · 1973

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rublee v. Carrier Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Keralink International, Inc. v. Geri-Care Pharmaceuticals CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2023
  3. Schneider Electric Buildings Critical Systems, Inc. v. Western Surety Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2016
  4. Margaret Rublee, Et Ano. v. Carrier Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  5. Rublee v. Carrier Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API