Legal Opinion

Atuahene v. City of Hartford

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 31, 2001No. 00-7711PublishedCited by 241 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of *34said district court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED.

Plaintiff-appellant Steve Atuahene appeals from a May 5, 2000 judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Goettel, J.) dismissing his complaint.

On April 7, 1999, Atuahene filed suit against defendants-appellees in district court, alleging a host of constitutional and state common law claims. The complaint failed to differentiate among the defendants, alleging instead violations by “the defendants,” and failed to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Simmons v. AbruzzoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995

3Cited by241 opinions

  1. Russell Marcilis, II v. Township of RedfordCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  2. Anwar v. Fairfield Greenwich Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  3. George v. Professional Disposables International, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  4. Adobe System Inc. v. Blue Source Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
  5. Schwartzco Enterprises LLC v. TMH Management, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014

236 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API