Legal Opinion

State v. Maes

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided February 12, 2003No. 22,661PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ALARID, Judge.

{1} Defendant, Lorraine Maes, appeals her conviction on one count of harboring a felon. As we explain below, the district court committed fundamental error by allowing Defendant to be convicted of harboring a felon without requiring the State to prove that the person allegedly harbored by Defendant had committed a specified felony and that Defendant knew that this person had committed the specified felony.

DISCUSSION

{2} Defendant was convicted of harboring Brandon Cordova in violation of NMSA 1978, § 30-22-4 (1963). Section 30-22-4 defines harboring a felon as “knowingly…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Buzbee v. DonnellyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. VallejosNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. State v. WynnNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. State v. GardnerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. State v. SernaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. GrahamNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. State v. VargasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. State v. MaldonadoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. State v. KalinowskiNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. State v. VargasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API