State v. Maes
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALARID, Judge.
{1} Defendant, Lorraine Maes, appeals her conviction on one count of harboring a felon. As we explain below, the district court committed fundamental error by allowing Defendant to be convicted of harboring a felon without requiring the State to prove that the person allegedly harbored by Defendant had committed a specified felony and that Defendant knew that this person had committed the specified felony.
DISCUSSION
{2} Defendant was convicted of harboring Brandon Cordova in violation of NMSA 1978, § 30-22-4 (1963). Section 30-22-4 defines harboring a felon as “knowingly…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Buzbee v. DonnellyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. VallejosNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2000
- State v. WynnNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
- State v. GardnerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
- State v. SernaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. GrahamNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. VargasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. MaldonadoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
- State v. KalinowskiNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. VargasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.