Legal Opinion

Dodson v. Severs

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 15, 1896PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bird, V. C.

The testimony in this case shows that the relation of parent and child existed between the grantor and grantee. There is an *306utter absence of any proof that the grantee was ever emancipated. It is very manifest that the relation, which existed from the time the child was one year of age until she became twenty-one, continued unbroken till her death. This being the case, the question is, was her grandfather or grantor under any obligations to the grandchild, his grantee, at the time of the execution of the deed; and if not, then was the deed, which passed the title to the grantee,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Disbrow v. DurandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1892

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kowal v. SudolNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
  2. Williamson v. BenderNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929
  3. Habay v. BelakNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API