Legal Opinion
Kabayan v. Yepremian
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 20, 1997No. 96-55039PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
Estepan Kabayan appeals the district court’s judgment, affirming the bankruptcy court’s summary judgment in favor of Sanwa Bank of California (“Sanwa”) in Kabayan’s adversary action against Sanwa and debtors Nerces and Elize Yepremian (“the Yepremians”). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(d), and we affirm.
We review de novo a grant of summary judgment. See Bagdadi v. Nazar, 84 F.3d 1194, 1197 (9th Cir.1996). Moreover, we independently review the bankruptcy court’s decision and do not give deference to the district court. See Robertson v. Peters (In re Weisman), 5 F.8d 417, 419…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Parks School of Business, Inc., Dba Parks College, a New Mexico Corporation v. Fife Symington Roy A. Nicholson Sally HeinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Credit Alliance Corp. v. Idaho Asphalt Supply, Inc. (In Re Blumer)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Probasco v. Eads (In re Probasco)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Kowalsky v. KimberlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.