Coleman v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Concurrence
CONCURRING OPINION
Wiltrout, J.
I concur in the result reached in this case, but do not concur in that part of the majority-opinion which holds that error in a trial court’s action in directing a verdict may not be presented by an independent assignment of errors.
The following wording was added to Rule 1-7 in 1943:
“The court’s action in directing or refusing to direct a verdict shall be shown by order book entry. Error may be predicated upon such ruling or upon the giving or refusing to give a written instruction directing a verdict.”
The purpose of this change in the Rule seems clear. It was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bartley v. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1942
- Hansbrough v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
- Long v. ArcherIndiana Supreme Court · 1943
- McKinnon v. ParrillIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
- Coleman v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis RailroadIndiana Court of Appeals · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.