Hill v. Southern Ry. Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Cothran.
Action for $15,473.05 the net loss on 142 bales of cotton alleged to have been partially destroyed by fire communicated by sparks from the defendant’s engine.
The defendant supplemented its plea of general denial by setting up a contract between the plaintiff and the railroad company, whereby, in consideration of the defendant’s permission to allow certain warehouses to be placed on its right of way, the plaintiff agreed to indemnify the defendant from all loss by fire, however resulting “arising by reason of the presence of said…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Horsford v. Carolina Glass Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
- Burgess v. Germany-Roy-Brown Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
- Duke v. ParkerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
3Cited by4 opinions
- Manchester Marble Co. v. Rutland RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1927
- Jackson v. Enola Ginning CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
- Fraser-Patterson Lumber Co. v. Southern Ry. Co.District Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1948
- Ballard v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.District Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1956