Legal Opinion · Dissent

Reynolds v. State

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1916No. Criminal No. 406Published

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Maricopa. R. C. Stanford, Judge.

1DissentRoss, C. J.

(Dissenting). — The information lays the venue-of the charge in Maricopa county, state of Arizona, and whether this is correct or not is the important and serious. *402•question, as I view it. Stripped of formalities, the information accused the appellant “of the crime of introducing intoxicating liquor into the state of Arizona, . . . committed as follows, to wit: The said W. A. Reynolds on or about the twenty-third day of December, 1915, and before the filing •of this information, at and in the county of Maricopa, state of Arizona, did then and there willfully and unlawfully introduce into the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. HusenSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Reid v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. Reid v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  4. Gherna v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1915
  5. United States v. LairCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API