Legal Opinion

Markland v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 21, 1999No. 99-1639PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Appellant’s claims under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 are time-barred. See id. R. 3.850(b). None of appellant’s claims qualify under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). As to the double jeopardy claims, see Novaton v. State 634 So.2d 607 (Fla.1994). As to the claims based on State v. Gray, 654 So.2d 552 (Fla.1995), see State v. Woodley, 695 So.2d 297, 298 (Fla.1997) (stating that the decision in Gray is not retroactive).

Affirmed.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. GraySupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  2. Novaton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
  3. State v. WoodleySupreme Court of Florida · 1997

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Markland v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016