Legal Opinion

Shannon v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 31, 1956No. 354, Docket 23999PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK, Circuit Judge.

The trial judge found that the cables supplied by the United States were “kinky” when supplied to Smith, the stevedoring employer. As the oral testimony supports this finding, it is not “clearly erroneous.” However, the testimony perhaps justifies an inference of fact that, despite the kinks, the cable was “in good working order,” i. e., that stevedores regard the presence of kinks as a normal condition of a cable and consider it a part of the stevedore’s ordinary function to remove such kinks.1

But we do not rest our decision on that ground, since we think Smith liable…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. American Mut. Liability Ins. Co. v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Antonio Paliaga v. Luckenbach Steamship Company, and Third-Party v. Turner & Blanchard, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  2. A/s J. Ludwig Mowinckels Rederi v. Commercial Stevedoring Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
  3. Damanti v. A/S IngerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  4. General Electric Company v. Mason & Dixon Lines, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1960
  5. Shenker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API