Legal Opinion

Inhabitants of Warren v. Inhabitants of Thomaston

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 1, 1857PublishedCited by 15 opinions

This action is assumpsit for the support of a pauper, and comes before the full court upon exceptions to the rulings of May, J., and on motion. The exceptions only are considered in the opinion of the court. The action was brought March 29, 1855, and the question is whether the pauper gained a settlement in the defendant town by a continued residence of five years.

Read the full summary

This action is assumpsit for the support of a pauper, and comes before the full court upon exceptions to the rulings of May, J., and on motion. The exceptions only are considered in the opinion of the court. The action was brought March 29, 1855, and the question is whether the pauper gained a settlement in the defendant town by a continued residence of five years. It was admitted that he had received no supplies as a pauper .from any town other than those sued for in this action. The verdict being for the plaintiffs the defendants excepted to the instructions of the presiding judge. It…

1Opinion of the CourtRice, J.

The case comes up on motion and exceptions. The motion is based upon several specifications, which may, however, be reduced to two general propositions. First, that the verdict is against the evidence in the case. Second, that it is against law. The first proposition may properly be discussed under the motion; the second under the exceptions.

The question at issue was the legal settlement of a pauper by the name of Lawrence. It appears from the case that the original derivative settlement of the pauper was in Warren. The proposition to be established by the plaintiffs was, that he had lost…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Martinez Ex Rel. Morales v. BynumSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Miller v. Sovereign Camp Woodmen of the WorldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Prince v. InmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  4. Martin v. Lafon Nursing Facility of the Holy Family, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2008
  5. Owens v. StovallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API