Carroll Electric Membership Corp. v. Simpson
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Carlisle, Presiding Judge.
1. While ordinarily questions of negligence and diligence and of cause and proximate cause are questions solely for consideration of the jury (Rowe v. Camp, 45 Ga. App. 794 (1), 165 SE 894; Frye v. Pyron, 51 Ga. App. 613 (1), 181 SE 142), and such questions should not be solved by the court on demurrer except in plain, palpable and indisputable cases (Long Construction Co. v. Ryals, 102 Ga. App. 66 (1), 115 SE2d 726), yet, where the petition shows that the acts and omissions of the defendant alleged therein and charged as constituting negligence, if they were in fact…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Moore v. Seaboard Air-Line Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Laseter v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Long Construction Co. v. RyalsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- Frye v. PyronCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Rowe v. CampCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
3Cited by9 opinions
- Union Carbide Corp. v. HoltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Brooks v. DouglasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Williams v. Nico Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Brown v. IocovozziCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Georgia Power Co. v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.