Halmekangas v. Dedrick
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
The jury trial in this case resulted in a verdict of no cause of action. At close of proofs, plaintiff moved for a directed verdict on the issue of liability, and this motion was denied. *509After verdict, plaintiff moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. It was denied and plaintiff appeals.
A review of the record convinces this Court that a jury question was presented as to defendant’s negligence, even though such review convinces this Court that, had it sat as trier of the facts, defendant’s negligence was established. The latter is not the test for disturbing jury verdicts. In re McCord…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- McCord v. McCordMichigan Supreme Court · 1928