Legal Opinion
Delaware River Port Authority v. Tiemann
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided March 10, 1976No. 75-2328PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SEITZ, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal by plaintiff, the Delaware River Port Authority (“Authority”), from an order of the district court granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment and sustaining an order of the Federal Highway Administrator (“Administrator”) reducing the tolls which plaintiff charges on its bridges.
The Authority, created pursuant to an interstate compact between Pennsylvania and New Jersey, operates toll bridges spanning the Delaware River, a high speed rail commuter line (“PATCO”), and in addition, maintains a World Trade Division to promote the Port…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Greater Boston Television Corp. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- Delaware River Port Authority v. TiemannDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1975
- Meadville Master Antenna, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of Ameria, Lamb Communications, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
3Cited by4 opinions
- Neal v. Secretary of the NavyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
- Delaware River Port Authority v. TiemannDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1976
- Delaware River Port Authority v. TiemannCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977