Legal Opinion

City of Paducah v. Konkle

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided December 16, 1930PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Commissioner Stanley — ■

Affirming.

The appellee, Prank Konkle, by his next friend, recovered judgment for $5,000 against the city of Paducah for injuries sustained by him when the pony he was riding fell with and on him, because, as he contends, of a defect in the street. The accident occurred at the intersection of Second and Washington streets in Paducah, which are paved with asphalt and a 20-inch concrete gutter. There was a hole or depression in the concrete and asphalt where they joined which was 3 to 5 inches deep, 8. or 10 inches wide, and about 4 feet long,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gnau v. AckermanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  2. Tudor v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  3. Bruce's Administratrix v. CallahanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  4. Bickel Asphalt Paving Co. v. YeagerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  5. Nussbaum v. CaskeyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wigginton's Adm'r v. Louisville Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  2. City of Ludlow v. AlbersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  3. Warfield Natural Gas Co. v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  4. City of Louisville v. Hale's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  5. City of Paintsville v. SpearsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API