Legal Opinion

Maslek v. Penna. R. R.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 25, 1927No. 7742PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLevine, J.

Mike Maslek, as a member of a section gang employed by the Pennsylvania Railroad Co., was inj'ured by a chip striking one of his eyes while engaged in cutting a tie with a dull adze. It was claimed by Maslek that there was a. breach of duty in that the Company was negligent in peremptorily ordering him to use the dull adze, and that it failed to furnish him with goggles for the protection of his eyes.

The case was formerly in the Court of Appeals, and this court held that it was a question for the jury to determine whether or not an adze is a simple tool. The amended petition in the second…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Allen v. Dayton Union Ry. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API