Legal Opinion

Henrietta Piping, Inc. v. Antetomaso & Micca Group, LLC

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 2006Published

1Opinion of the Court

*910OPINION OF THE COURT

Kenneth R. Fisher, J.

Defendant, Antetomaso & Micca Group, LLC, has moved for an order pursuant to CPLR 6514 canceling the notice of pendency, or in the alternative, setting an amount for an undertaking at $100,000 for the cancellation of the notice of pendency pursuant to CPLR 6515. Plaintiff opposes the cancellation of the notice of pendency, or in the alternative, seeks an undertaking in the amount of $334,000.

This dispute stems from a contract for the purchase and sale of the Mayer Farms subdivision in the Town of Penfield. By contract dated January 25, 2001, defendant…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v. Long Island Rail RoadNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Chicago, Texas & Mexican Central Railway Co. v. TitteringtonTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Rudman v. Cowles Communications, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Masson v. BovetCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
  5. 5303 Realty Corp. v. O & Y Equity Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1984

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API