Legal Opinion
(HC) Sholl v. Atchley
District Court, E.D. California
Decided March 15, 2023No. 2:21-cv-00064Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BRIAN SHOLL, II, No. 2:21-cv-0064 KJM AC P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 MATTHEW ATCHLEY, WARDEN, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, seeks habeas relief 18 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter has been referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 19 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 Before the court are respondent’s motion to dismiss and petitioner’s motion to strike 21 restitution.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Rhines v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Baldwin v. ReeseSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.