Legal Opinion

McCarthy v. Lawley

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 7, 1970PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In the first above-entitled proceeding: Order affirmed, without costs, on opinion at Appellate Division.

In each of the other proceedings: Order affirmed, without costs (see Matter of McCarthy v. Lawley, decided herewith).

Concur: Judges Scileppi, Breitel, Jasen and Gibson. Judges Burke and Bergan dissent in part and vote to modify by allowing a substitution of names in accordance with section 138 (subd. 4) of the Election Law. Chief Judge Fuld dissents and votes to reverse in the following memorandum: Although I agree—with Judges Burke and Bergan—that, at the very least, a substitution of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ottinger v. LomenzoNew York Supreme Court · 1970

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Carey v. ChiavaroliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Gleason v. TutunjianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. DiResto v. CornellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  4. Falcone v. ManupellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. McDonough v. TutunjianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API