Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided September 19, 1979No. 59860PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR REHEARING

CLINTON, Judge.

Any method worthy of being called a “system” is expected to work at least tolerably well. What is now before us demonstrates, however, that sometimes the criminal justice system functions at a level well below acceptable tolerance. With the thought that critical evaluation of one operation of the mechanism may provoke self-examination of others, we assay the instant situation in some detail. Our critique is not of individual performance but of the mechanical operation of the system itself in this case.

Appellant was arrested in the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Thompson v. City of LouisvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Ferguson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. Stiggers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  5. Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Galitz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  2. Prochaska v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. McGlynn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  4. Yates v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
  5. Lemmons v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API