Rockwell v. Clark
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Assumpsit, brought to the City Court of the city of Hartford, and tried to the court before Sumner, J. Facts found and judgment rendered for the plaintiff. Motion in error by the defendant. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtPardee, J.
In July, 1875, Oscar Holcomb and Julia H. Rockwell, then and now the wife of the plaintiff, formed á co-partnership at Hartford under the name of Holcomb & Rockwell, for the purpose of engaging in the slate-roofing business. The said Julia furnished the capital in money and slate, and was to have two-thirds of the profits; Holcomb *535'was to give his services. In October following the partnership was dissolved, and the said Julia purchased Holcomb’s interest therein, and continued the business alone some little time thereafter for the purpose of completing unfinished contracts, although she…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Belden v. SedgwickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
- Irwin v. IrwinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1894