Legal Opinion

Nixon v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 22, 2009No. SC07-953PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Per curiam

Joe Elton Nixon appeals the denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.851 and 3.203. Because the order concerns postconviction relief from a sentence of death, we have jurisdiction of the appeal under article V, section 3(b)(1), Florida Constitution. For the reasons expressed below, we affirm both the trial court’s denial of postconviction relief and its finding that Nixon is not mentally retarded.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Joe Elton Nixon was charged, convicted, and sentenced to death for the 1984 murder of a Tallahassee woman.…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. State v. MaestasUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Schoenwetter v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2010
  3. Franqui v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2011
  4. Simmons v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2012
  5. Johnston v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2010

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API