Nixon v. State
Supreme Court of Florida
1Per curiam
Joe Elton Nixon appeals the denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.851 and 3.203. Because the order concerns postconviction relief from a sentence of death, we have jurisdiction of the appeal under article V, section 3(b)(1), Florida Constitution. For the reasons expressed below, we affirm both the trial court’s denial of postconviction relief and its finding that Nixon is not mentally retarded.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Joe Elton Nixon was charged, convicted, and sentenced to death for the 1984 murder of a Tallahassee woman.…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- State v. MaestasUtah Supreme Court · 2012
- Schoenwetter v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2010
- Franqui v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2011
- Simmons v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2012
- Johnston v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2010
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.