Legal Opinion

In the Interest of B.P.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 1, 1989No. 88-2003PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The state does not dispute the appellant’s contention that the trial court, in this juvenile proceeding, was precluded from suspending a driver’s license beyond the defendant’s nineteenth birthday. Jurisdiction over the defendant as a juvenile ceases when he attains the age of nineteen. See C.L.D. v. Beauchamp, 464 So.2d 1264 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); State v. A.N.F., 413 So.2d 146 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982); G.W.M. v. State, 391 So.2d 738 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980).

We find no error in that portion of the order requiring that the defendant perform one-thousand hours of community service at the rate of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. G. W. M. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  2. State v. A.N.F.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  3. In the Interest of C.L.D. v. BeauchampDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  2. D.M. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  3. V.I. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  4. DM v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  5. R.M.S. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API