Stanton v. Carlson Sales, Inc.
Connecticut Superior Court
1Opinion of the CourtBlue, J.
For almost three decades, “American courts have struggled with the question of whether to hold commercial sellers of used products to the same legal standards of responsibility for defects as commercial sellers of new products.” Restatement (Third), Torts, Products Liability § 8 comment (a), p. 166 (1998). No published Connecticut decision has squarely addressed this issue, and courts of other jurisdictions are divided on the subject. Annot., Products Liability: Application of Strict Liability Doctrine to Seller of Used Product, 9 A.L.R.5th 1 (1993). The United States Court of Appeals for the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
- Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
- Saratoga Fishing Co. v. J. M. Martinac & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Potter v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gaumer v. ROSSVILLE TRUCK AND TRACTOR CO.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2011
- Allenberg v. Bentley Hedges Travel Serv. Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Cataldo v. Lazy Days RV Center, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006