Barron Chiropractic & Rehabilitation, P.C. v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co. of Boston, Inc.
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
Driscoll, PJ.
Plaintiff, Barron Chiropractic & Rehabilitation, EC. (“Barron”), appealed the trial judge’s allowance of a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Mass.R.Civ.P., Rule 56 filed by Enterprise Rent A Car Company of Boston, Inc. (“Enterprise”), Defendant. Barton also appeals the trial judge’s denial of Plaintiff’s cross-motion for summary judgment pursuant to Mass.RCiv.P., Rule 56. The primary issue on appeal is whether the trial judge erred in granting Enterprise’s motion for summary judgment and denying Barron’s motion for the assessment of attorney fees. For the reasons stated…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Linthicum v. ArchambaultMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Attorney General v. BaileyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Boston Symphony Orchestra, Inc. v. Commercial Union InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Spence v. Boston Edison Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- R.W. Granger & Sons, Inc. v. J & S Insulation, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.