Legal Opinion

State v. Gage

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 24, 1989No. 85-12-35402; CA A48409Published

1Per curiam

Defendant pleaded no contest to a charge of criminal mischief. The court suspended imposition of sentence and placed him on probation for three years. Later, he was found to be in violation of the terms of probation, and it was revoked. When sentence was imposed, the court ordered that defendant

“repay all costs incurred by the State in providing a defense for this revocation hearing * *

There was no amount stated in the order or any specification as to what amount defendant was ordered to repay.

On appeal, defendant does not challenge the revocation or the sentence in any way except to argue…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. TompkinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API