Legal Opinion
Rosenberg v. Matulis
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 16, 1933PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.
The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for injuries suffered in a collision be tween two automobiles, one a taxicab in which she was riding as a passenger for hire, and which was owned by one of the defendants and being operated at the time by his agent within the scope of his employment, and the other an automobile operated by the defendant Matulis. The trial court gave judgment for the plaintiff against both defendants and both have appealed. The finding states the following facts: The collision occurred at a street intersection. It was night and the headlights on both cars…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Leete v. Griswold PostSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Neumann v. ApterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- Jackson v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Beatty v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1933
- Rose v. CampitelloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pinto v. SpignerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Goodhue v. BallardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Vecchiarelli v. WeissSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Graveline v. LivingstonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943