Legal Opinion

Meek v. Meek

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 15, 1876PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from, Washington Circuit Court. Action at law upon a judgment rendered in the Court of Common Pleas of Carroll county, Ohio, November 16, 1850. A demurrer to the petition of plaintff was sustained and judgment rendered thereon for defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.

I. The petition, after alleging .the recovery of the judgment sued upon, on the 16th day of November, 1850, in the Court of Common Pleas of Carroll county, Ohio, and setting out a copy thereof, shows that the judgment was revived by scire facias, September 8,1878. It does not appear that the scire facias was personally served, though the order of revivor shows that the court found that service was duly had according to law. Another scwe facias was issued and personally served upon defendant in Washington county, in this State, and thereon an order of revivor was had, May 2, 1874. The final…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McElmoyle Ex Rel. Bailey v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  2. President of the Bank of Alabama v. DaltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  3. Denegre v. HaunSupreme Court of Iowa · 1862
  4. Vredenburgh v. SnyderSupreme Court of Iowa · 1858
  5. Randolph v. KingU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1807

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mahoney v. State InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  2. Burns v. BurnsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  3. Weiser v. McDowellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  4. Kolbow v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Williams v. BurnsideSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API