State v. Stevens
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.
Defendant appeals his conviction for driving to endanger, in violation of 23 V.S.A. § 1091(a). The only evidence of such a violation was the fact that defendant was driving at a speed of 103 miles per hour on Route 7 in Manchester, Vermont. Defendant argues that speed alone can never be sufficient to convict an operator of driving to endanger and, further, in this case there were factors that reduced the risks associated with high speed operation. We affirm.
The statute in question provides: “No person shall operate a motor vehicle on a public highway in a careless or negligent manner ... or…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. DerouchieSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
- Fisher v. ZimmermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- State v. NealeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
- People v. NowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- State v. LabonteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1958
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. RitchieSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
- State v. BeayonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
- State v. RobergeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
- State v. ParenteauSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
- State v. StevensSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988