Legal Opinion

Lukens v. Oliver H. Bair Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 13, 1931No. Appeal 371PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion bx

Cunningham, J.,

This appeal is by the plaintiff from an order of the court below discharging her rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense; the pleadings consist of her statement of claim and the defendant’s original and supplemental affidavits of defense. The material facts pleaded by each party are either expressly admitted, or not specifically denied, by the other. Defendant, incorporated under the laws of this state “for the purpose of engaging in the undertaking business,” has no power under its charter to enter into contracts of insurance, nor has it…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. TolerSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
  2. Graves v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  3. Sauer v. School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  4. Bedell v. Oliver H. Bair Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  5. Repplier v. JacobsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ruto v. Italian Burial Casket Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Rogers. Admrx. v. Penn Mut. Life Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Downing v. School District of Erie, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Erie County1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API