Legal Opinion

Metallic Rubber Tire Co. v. Hartford Rubber Works Co.

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided June 12, 1920No. 1261PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Equity. Suit by the Metallic Rubber Tire Company against the Hartford Rubber Works Company. On exceptions to master’s report.

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, District Judge.

This matter is again before the court on exceptions to the master’s second report. The plaintiff and defendant each filed exceptions. The plaintiff further filed a motion to strike out certain portions of the report, and, as thus modified, that the report be accepted and confirmed, and that a decree be granted for the plaintiff to recover $183,383.53, with interest from July 1, 1910.

A brief history of this case seems necessary. It may be found in the following summary:

The suit was brought March 5, 1908, and on July 27, 1911, Judge Platt dismissed the bill. 189 Eed. 402.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Metallic Rubber Tire Co. v. Hartford Rubber Works Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1917
  2. Metallic Rubber Tire Co. v. Hartford Rubber Works Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Metallic Rubber Tire Co. v. Hartford Rubber Works Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API