Legal Opinion

Flores v. Wainwright

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 13, 1970No. 70-793PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANN, Judge.

Flores seeks appellate review of denial of his third motion pursuant to Fla. Cr.PR 1.850, 33 F.S.A., asserting that the appointed counsel assigned him said that he would appeal but didn’t. His right to appellate review through habeas corpus where denied a normal appeal through state action is clear. Baggett v. Wainwright, Fla.1969, 229 So.2d 239. This applies as well to denial of appeal from post-conviction proceedings. Cappetta v. Wainwright, Fla.1967, 203 So.2d 609.

Flores alleges a language problem which caused him to think that he was pleading guilty to a violation of Fla.Stat.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Baggett v. WainwrightSupreme Court of Florida · 1969
  3. Cappetta v. WainwrightSupreme Court of Florida · 1967
  4. Johnson v. WainwrightSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
  5. Rudolph v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McCrae v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  2. Ward v. DuggerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  3. Nova v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  4. Curry v. WainwrightDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  5. Nova v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API