Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Rahman

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided August 20, 2009No. 2008-CA-1511PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JOAN BERNARD ARMSTRONG, Chief Judge.

| 'The plaintiff-appellant in the main demand and defendant-appellee in reconvention, Eulister Wilson, appeals pro se a judgment rendered by the First City Court of the City of New Orleans on September 11, 2008, dismissing his claim with prejudice against the defendant-appellee in the main demand and plaintiff-appellee in reconvention, Irshad Daniel Rahman. Mr. Rahman in turn appeals the dismissal in the same judgment of his reconventional demand against Mr. Wilson.

This is a fact intensive case involving no significant legal issues. Therefore, our review…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Amb. Serv.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  2. Ladner v. Government Employees' Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. Temple v. Schwegmann Giant Super MarketsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Radcliffe 10, L.L.C. v. Zip Tube Systems of Louisiana, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API