Legal Opinion

Hubley v. Cram

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 28, 1987No. C3-86-2080PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Upon a trial to the court, respondents, Indianapolis Life Insurance Company and its general agent Roger Hubley d/b/a Chartered Financial Services of Minnesota, Inc., were awarded $9,000 they claimed appellant, their former insurance agent Ronald Cram, owed them. Appellant argues that the trial court erred in concluding he was personally liable for commission advances after his termination. We reverse.

FACTS

Appellant, Roger Cram, was employed by respondents as an insurance agent under their “Special Agent Contract.” While so employed, appellant would receive cash advances…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Seren v. DouglasColorado Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Tannen v. Equitable Life Ins. Co. of Washington, DCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  3. Deutz & Crow Co., Inc. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. St. Cloud Aviation, Inc. v. HubbellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fletcher, Barnhardt & White, Inc. v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Hubley v. CramCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API