Legal Opinion

Winship v. Ricketts

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 9, 1929No. 8391PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN VALKENBURGH, Circuit Judge.

Appellants, consisting of the heirs of Ceyon. Winship, a deceased full-blood Choctaw Indian woman, seek to recover from appellees-an alleged remainder interest in certain land in Carter county, Okl., the same having been conveyed on January 14, 1905, by Sampson Winship and Ceyon Winship, his wife, to appellee B. C. Ricketts. The deed is in the-words and figures following, to wit:

“Indian Territory, Southern District.
“This indenture, made this 14th day of January, 1905, by and between Sampson Winship and his wife, Ceyon Winship, parties of the first part, and B.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Heckman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. United States v. California & Oregon Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. SlaghtSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. Bissell v. Spring Valley TownshipSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. AllenIndiana Supreme Court · 1888

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Guettel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
  2. Vinson v. GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
  3. United States v. Truckee-Carson Irrigation DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  4. United States v. Truckee-Carson Irrigation DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API