Legal Opinion
People v. Holder
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 4, 2007PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal by the defendant, by permission, from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Knipel, J.), dated June 19, 2006, which denied his motion pursuant to CPL 440.20 to set aside so much of his sentence as allegedly imposed a period of post-release supervision.
Ordered that the order is affirmed.
We conclude that the defendant’s motion pursuant to CPL 440.20 was properly denied, but for reasons different from those relied upon by the Supreme Court (see People v Noble, 37 AD3d 622 [2007]). At sentencing, the court explicitly stated that no period of post-release supervision was imposed and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hill v. United States Ex Rel. WamplerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Sean Earley v. Timothy MurrayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- People v. HillNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- People v. NobleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. RoysterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. StromanNew York Supreme Court · 2007