Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Close v. Meehan

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 1956No. 33670PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwellenbach, J.

Since its incorporation, the city of Spokane has discharged its raw sewage into the Spokane river. The state department of health, by notice dated De-. cember 4, 1935, notified the city that a public nuisance existed in the Spokane and Columbia rivers resulting from such discharge of raw sewage, and ordered the city to abate the nuisance.

Subsequent thereto, the legislature enacted chapter 186 of the Laws of 1941, p. 529 (RCW 35.88.080), forbidding the city from depositing its sewage into the Spokane river and providing that the same should become a public nuisance which might be summarily…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Amende v. City of BremertonWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. State Ex Rel. Northwestern Bond & Mortgage Corp. v. HinkleWashington Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ford v. LoganWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Paget v. LoganWashington Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Neilson v. Vashon Island School District No. 402Washington Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Chief Seattle Properties, Inc. v. Kitsap CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  5. City of Yakima v. HuzaWashington Supreme Court · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API