Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Estes v. Staed

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 10, 1895PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Daniel Dillon, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRombauer, P. J.

The present controversy grows out of the return of the service of a summons in the case of Gamasche v. Grand Lodge of the Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen. In Gamasche to use v. Smythe et al., Garnishees, 60 Mo. App. 161, which was an incidental proceeding by garnishment on execution against the Grand Lodge, we decided that the garnishees could not be held, because the sheriff’s return in the main case *29was an insufficient return of constructive service to bring a foreign corporation into court, while the petition in the case stated that the Grand Lodge was a foreign corporation. The judgment…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Metcalf v. GarescheSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  2. Gamasche ex rel. Estes v. SmytheMissouri Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Hammerstein v. ParsonsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1888
  4. State ex rel. Metcalf v. GareschéMissouri Court of Appeals · 1877

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Christian v. International Ass'n of MacHinistsDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API