Legal Opinion

Chiumento v. State

New York Court of Claims

Decided August 9, 2004No. Claim No. 105270Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Diane L. Fitzpatrick, J.

Defendant brings a motion for summary judgment. Claimants have not responded to the motion. This motion was adjourned to March 3, 2004 after an order was granted relieving claimants’ prior attorneys, Melvin & Melvin, PLLC, of further representation of claimants. By that order, the court gave claimants 45 days to obtain new counsel and until March 3, 2004 to submit a response to defendant’s summary judgment motion. No other attorney has notified the court or filed a notice of appearance on behalf of claimants, and no opposition to the motion has been…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Pulka v. EdelmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Kleeman v. RheingoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Berger v. DykstraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API