Chiumento v. State
New York Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Diane L. Fitzpatrick, J.
Defendant brings a motion for summary judgment. Claimants have not responded to the motion. This motion was adjourned to March 3, 2004 after an order was granted relieving claimants’ prior attorneys, Melvin & Melvin, PLLC, of further representation of claimants. By that order, the court gave claimants 45 days to obtain new counsel and until March 3, 2004 to submit a response to defendant’s summary judgment motion. No other attorney has notified the court or filed a notice of appearance on behalf of claimants, and no opposition to the motion has been…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Pulka v. EdelmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Kleeman v. RheingoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Berger v. DykstraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.