Legal Opinion
Roberts v. Meek
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided May 9, 1927PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
* Corpus Juris-Cyc References: Appeal and Error, 3CJ, section 4, p. 300, n. 21; section 814, p. 916, n. 9; section 1296, p. 1208, n. 12; 4CJ, section 2609, p. 701, n. 49; section 2635, p. 720, n. 50; Appearances, 4CJ, section 3, p. 1316, n. 22; section 35, p. 1345, n. 71; Courts, 15CJ, section 164, p. 844, n. 18. At the threshold of this case we are met with a motion to dismiss.
The grounds assigned in the motion are: that the notice of the writ of error was not served twenty days before the return day.
The facts on this branch of the case are:
The writ commanded that the record be before the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Merchants Heat & Light Co. v. J. B. Clow & SonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Mount Vernon Car Manufacturing Co. v. Hirsch Rolling Mill Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1920
- Bankers' Iowa State Bank v. JordanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
- Kenner v. Doe Run Lead Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1897
- Garth v. MotterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dehatre v. RuenpohlSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
- State Ex Rel. Tighe v. BrownMissouri Court of Appeals · 1930
- Bowersock v. Missouri Valley Drainage DistrictMissouri Court of Appeals · 1942