Legal Opinion
Napier v. Peoples Stores Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 1, 1923PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBeach, J.
This cause was argued at the October Term, 1922, and as the result of that argument we were of opinion that, on the facts found, contracts A, B, and C had been broken by the defendant before the appointment of the receiver, and that contract D remained in force and unbroken at that date. A re-argument was ordered at the January Term on the single point whether the claim arising under contract D was allowable. As the questions involved are quite distinct, we discuss them separately.
Contracts A, B, C.
Under contract A, the sugar was to be delivered within the month of July, or as soon thereafter…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Roehm v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Central Trust Co. of Ill. v. Chicago Auditorium Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- People v. Globe Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- William Filene's Sons Co. v. WeedSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Wells v. Hartford Manilla Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1903
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Herald Publishing Co. v. BillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- International Paper Co. v. Priscilla Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Connecticut Junior Republic v. Sharon HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- In Re the Dissolution of the Edgewood Park Junior College, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Webster v. Southern California First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.