Legal Opinion

People v. Baxley

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1988PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Philip J. Chetta, J.

Defendant Luther Baxley has been indicted, inter alia, for criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree. He now moves for dismissal of the indictment for violation of his right to testify before the Grand Jury pursuant to CPL 190.50 (5).

For the reasons set forth, the court finds that defendant’s *517rights under CPL 190.50 (5) were not violated and therefore dismissal of the indictment under this section is not warranted.

The facts of the instant case present a unique question on the interrelationship between the defendant’s right to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. ChapmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Borrello v. BalbachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. People v. HigleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. People v. BalukasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. GuzmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. People v. BizzellNew York Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API